Bach.ai vs Hyros
Bach.ai is our product, so read this as an interested comparison. Hyros is an ad tracking and attribution tool. Bach.ai audits a Meta ad account, ranks every leak by the money it costs, and applies a fix only after you approve it. Here is where each one wins, including when Hyros is the better choice.
Updated · prices checked on each vendor’s own site
Bach.ai
Audit and fix for Meta ads
Audits your whole account and ranks every revenue leak by the money it costs you. It executes the fix on Meta only after you approve it.
- Pricing
- Starter $99/mo, Pro $149/mo, each incl. $10k/mo of ad spend, then 1% or 1.5% of spend above · /pricing
- At $30k/mo spend
- $299 Starter · $449 Pro
- Trial
- 7 days free · no credit card · then 1 free audit a month
Hyros
Ad tracking and attribution tool
Ad tracking that catches sales Meta and Google miss and sends them back to the ad platforms to improve their AI targeting, with its numbers in columns inside Meta and Google.
- Pricing
- One plan, priced by tracked monthly revenue: $230/mo up to $20k · higher brackets on its pricing page · as of 1 October 2026 · Hyros pricing page
- Trial
- No trial; results guarantee ("or you do not pay")
How Bach.ai’s price works: At $30k/mo of ad spend: Starter is $99 + 1% × $20k = $299, and Pro is $149 + 1.5% × $20k = $449. Over $150k/mo of spend moves to the Agency plan.
Hyros details from its own pages, checked 1 October 2026. Prices change, so confirm on the vendor’s pricing page.
Feature by feature
The honest table.
Including the rows where Hyros wins and Bach simply doesn't play.
| Capability | Bach.ai | Hyros |
|---|---|---|
| Full-account audit, leaks ranked by money impact | YesCore: every leak ranked by its money impact | NoTracking layer; “changes nothing about your ads” |
| Executes fixes on Meta for you | YesEach change applied only after you approve it | No |
| Creative-fatigue early warning | YesFatigue detection from Starter; new creative drafts on Pro (50 a month) | No |
| Plain-language AI you can ask about your account | YesBach.ai chat on your account data: 50 messages a day on Starter, unlimited on Pro | PartialClaude MCP server to query its data |
| Automation rules engine | PartialRules check the account and propose changes; none is applied until you approve it | No |
| Multi-touch attribution modeling | No | YesAd tracking and attribution; sends missed sales back to Meta and Google |
| A/B test management | No | No |
| Ad platforms covered | PartialMeta, plus Google Ads audit and intelligence from Starter (no live Google changes) · Meta goes deepest | PartialMeta and Google named on its pages |
| E-commerce focus | YesBuilt for e-commerce brands | PartialE-com, SaaS, education, call-based and agency |
| Transparent pricing on the website | Yes$99 or $149/mo incl. $10k of spend, then 1% or 1.5% above · 7-day free trial | YesPublished: $230/mo up to $20k tracked revenue |
included partial / add-on— not offered
Choose Bach.ai if…
- Your tracking is broadly fine and the account itself is what leaks money
- You want pixel and Conversions API health checked as part of a wider audit
- You want a tool that proposes and executes fixes, not just better data
- You want a lower entry price: $99/mo including $10k of ad spend
Choose Hyros if…
- Your ad platforms miss sales and you want them caught and sent back
- You run call-based, education or SaaS funnels as well as e-commerce
- You want a results guarantee on the tracking spend
- You have someone who will act on the better data
When is Bach.ai the wrong choice?
Bach.ai is the wrong choice if your ad platforms are missing sales. It reads the conversions Meta reports and checks pixel and Conversions API health, but it is not a tracking product like Hyros. Fix the tracking first, then audit the account.
FAQ
Bach.ai vs Hyros, answered.
Is Bach.ai a Hyros alternative?
No, they fix different layers. Hyros tracks sales the ad platforms miss and sends them back to improve targeting; its FAQ says it “changes nothing about your ads”. Bach.ai audits the ad account, ranks leaks by money impact and executes fixes once you approve. Bach.ai checks pixel and Conversions API health, but it is not a tracking replacement.
What does Hyros do better than Bach.ai?
Tracking. It catches sales Meta and Google miss, sends them back to the platforms, and shows its numbers in columns inside Meta and Google. It guarantees that you do not pay if your ads don’t grow.
Do I need both?
Possibly, if your funnel is long or runs through calls: Hyros to make conversions visible, Bach.ai to act on the account those conversions flow into. Hyros starts at $230/month up to $20k of tracked monthly revenue (as of 1 Oct 2026); Bach.ai Starter is $99 including $10k of ad spend, then 1% above.
Not ready to sign up yet? Get a free audit first.
Enter your email and we'll walk you through how Bach.ai compares on your real account — not Hyros's benchmark numbers.
Last updated