Editorial standards
How the Bach.ai blog is written.
Every post on this blog is drafted with AI. This page says what happens after that: how sources are linked and checked, what the line under each byline means, who owns the program, and how to get a mistake fixed.
How a post is made
01AI drafts every post
Every post on this blog starts as an AI draft. We say so on the post itself, in the line under the byline. The byline is never the AI: it is “The Bach.ai Team”.
02Sources are linked
The rule is that every fact links to where it came from: how Meta works to Meta’s own help and developer pages, a competitor’s price to the vendor’s pricing page with the date we read it, and our own numbers labelled as ours (“Bach.ai internal data”). Not every older post meets that rule yet. Where a number has no link, treat it as unverified.
03Facts are checked against those sources
An AI fact-check pass reads a post’s claims against the pages they link, and a claim that does not hold up is deleted rather than softened. Only a post whose every claim has been checked shows a fact-check date, so the line under the byline tells you which posts have had one.
04A person reviews a post only when the post says so
No human reviews every post. When a named person has reviewed one, the post names them and the date of their review.
What the line under the byline means
Every post carries exactly one of these three lines.
- “Drafted with AI. Reviewed by <name> on <date>.”
- A named person reviewed the post on that date.
- “Drafted with AI; facts checked against the linked sources on <date>.”
- Every claim was checked against its linked source on that date, by the AI fact-check pass.
- “Drafted with AI assistance and edited by the Bach.ai team.”
- No full fact-check or named review is on record for the post yet.
Who owns it
Santosh Valisetti, our co-founder and CTO, owns the Bach.ai blog. He sets these standards and answers for what we publish. That is not a review of every post: where he has reviewed one himself, the post names him and the date.
Our rules
No fabricated proof
We never invent case studies, customer names, logos, screenshots or testimonials. Sample audits and dashboards shown across the site are marked as samples. If we cannot show it honestly, we do not show it.
Our numbers are labelled as ours
A figure from our own data says so and gives its dates; it is never presented as an industry benchmark. Your real numbers only ever come from your own connected account.
Dates mean something
The rule is that a post’s “Updated” date moves when a fact, step, price or structure changes, and never for a wording-only edit.
Corrections
Spot something wrong? Email info@wittelsbach.ai with the page and the line. We check it against the source. If it is wrong, we fix the post, or delete the claim when no source supports it, and a fix that changes a fact moves the post’s “Updated” date.
Stop reading playbooks. Run one on your account.
Connect Meta and Bach runs a full audit — every leak ranked by the money it costs, in your own currency. Read-only until you approve a single change.
Last updated